Social media algorithmic versus professional journalists' news selection: Effects of gate keeping on traditional and social media news trust Articles uri icon

publication date

  • April 2024

issue

  • 4

volume

  • 25

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 1464-8849

Electronic International Standard Serial Number (EISSN)

  • 1741-3001

abstract

  • Research has shown positive attitudes toward journalists and their roles foster pro-democratic outcomes. With the rise of social media as news sources, algorithms operate as gatekeepers, which may alter linkages between public opinion, journalists, and media trust. However, results from a panel-survey conducted in the U.S. underline citizens' preference for journalist gatekeeping in fueling trust in traditional and social media news. Conversely, preference for algorithmic news selection does not affect people's levels of trust. Furthermore, traditional news use moderates this relationship as those who report higher traditional news use and a preference for professional news gatekeeping trust traditional news the most. This study contributes to current discussions on the effects of preference for journalists' or algorithmic news selection, arguing that evaluations of journalists' editorial work remain critical to explain media trust.

keywords

  • algorithms; gatekeeping; journalism; news selection; news trust; social media