Corporate social responsibility and public diplomacy as formulas to reduce hate speech on social media in the fake news era Articles uri icon

publication date

  • March 2023

start page

  • 340

end page

  • 352

issue

  • 2

volume

  • 28

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 1356-3289

abstract

  • Purpose: Analyse the presence of hate speech in society, placing special emphasis on social media. In this sense, the authors strive to build a formula to moderate this type of content, in which platforms and public institutions cooperate, from the fields of corporate social responsibility and public diplomacy, respectively.
    Design/methodology/approach: To this aim, it is important to focus efforts on the creation of counter-narratives; the establishment of content moderation guidelines, which are not necessarily imposed by unilateral legislation; the promotion of suitable scenarios for the involvement of civil society; transparency on the part of social media companies; and supranational cooperation that is as transnational as possible. To exemplify the implementation of initiatives against hate speech, two cases are analysed that are paradigmatic for assuming two effective approaches to the formula indicated by the authors.
    Findings: The authors analyse, in the case of the European Union, its 'Code of conduct to counteract illegal online hate speech”, which included the involvement of different social media companies. And in the case of Canada, the authors discuss the implementation of the bill to include a definition of hate speech and the establishment of specific sanctions for this in the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Canadian Penal Code.
    Originality/value: The case of the European Union was a way of seeking consensus with social media companies without legislation, while the case of Canada involved greater legislative and penalisation. Two ways of seeking the same goal: curbing hate speech.

subjects

  • Information Science

keywords

  • hate speech; corporate social responsibility; public diplomacy; social media; communication; hate crimes; freedom of expression