Systematic Review on Diagnostic Reference Levels for Computed Tomography Examinations in Radiation Therapy Planning Articles uri icon

authors

  • RAO, SHREEKRIPA
  • SHARAN, KRISHNA
  • SUKUMAR, SURESH
  • CHANDRAGUTHI, SRINIDHI GURURAJARAO
  • NISHA DSOUZA, RECHAL
  • DAVID, LEENA R.
  • RAVICHANDRAN, SNEHA
  • UZUN, BERNA
  • KADAVIGERE, RAJAGOPAL
  • UZUN OZSAHIN, DILBER

publication date

  • March 2023

issue

  • 6

volume

  • 13

International Standard Serial Number (ISSN)

  • 2075-4418

abstract

  • Background: In August 2017, the European Commission awarded the “European Study on Clinical Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRL) for X-ray Medical Imaging” project to the European Society of Radiology to provide up-to-date Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications. This work aimed to conduct an extensive literature review by analyzing the most recent studies published and the data provided by the National Competent Authorities to understand the current situation regarding Diagnostic Reference Levels based on clinical indications for Radiation Therapy Computed Tomography. Objective: To review the literature on established DRLs and methodologies for establishing Diagnostic reference levels in radiation therapy planning computed tomography (RTCT). Methods: Eligibility criteria: A cohort study (observational design) reporting DRLs in adult patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) for radiation therapy for the region head and neck or pelvis were included. The comprehensive literature searches for the relevant studies published between 2000 and 2021 were performed using PubMed, Scopus, CINHAL, Web of Science, and ProQuest. Results: Three hundred fifty-six articles were identified through an extensive literature search. Sixty-eight duplicate reports were removed. The title and abstract of 288 studies were assessed and excluded if they did not meet the inclusion criteria. Sixteen of 288 articles were selected for full-text screening (studies conducted between 2000 and 2021). Five articles were included in the review after the full-text screening. Conclusions: A globally approved standard protocol that includes scanning techniques, dose measurement method, and DRL percentile needs to be established to make a valuable and accurate comparison with international DRLs

subjects

  • Medicine

keywords

  • radiotherapy; diagnostic reference levels; head and neck; pelvis; dlp; ctdivol